• 79 Posts
  • 82 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • Yes, I do get paid. Sometimes considerably (for what tech writing can provide).

    Indeed, writing tech articles on Medium has allowed me to get some extra income/free-time in between jobs, which I use to upskill myself and then share what I learn with the community (with some amount of friction regarding the paywall). This self-reinforcing loop is quite appealing to me, and - I would argue - aligns somewhat with my take on the Kantian categorical imperative.

    For what it’s worth, I like the typesetting. Medium also has extremely good SEO, likely from some direct negotiation with search engines, I assume. Eventually I plan to move my tech writings to my own blog, with some sort of minimal ad system, no paywalls. Also, I usually unpaywall my tech articles after the window of high income dries up.

    I updated the post to use the “friend link” which should allow you to read for free. (I didn’t realize you could edit the link on lemmy after publishing).

    in which case I’d much rather pay directly to the authors.

    All my stories have a link to my ko-fi at the end, but the income from that is significantly less than what I get from Medium directly.

    Edit: Thanks @[email protected] for donating! Much appreciated!
























  • Depends on how you want to define your domain knowledge.

    The thing you need to define for sure is the predicate mother/2 (Which has arity 2, or in other words, two arguments). From then on, multiple options are available:

    1. Take mother(X, Y) as an “axiom”, and define mother terms for all elements:
    mother(abel, eve).
    mother(isaac, sarah).
    
    1. Derive mother(X, Y) from female(X) and parent(X, Y) terms.
    mother(X, Y) :- 
      parent(X, Y), 
      female(Y).
    
    1. Smash the institutional gender power structures and define only parent/2 terms instead of mother/2 and father/2.








  • Yes, I’ll host the source code on GitHub. I could consider mirroring it on Sourcehut if there’s enough interest, but I prefer the PR and Issues workflow on GitHub for collaboration. Plus, more people tend to have GitHub accounts than GitLab or Sourcehut, which makes it easier for contributors.

    I get the concern about Microsoft, and while I’m not a fan of the company, GitHub has advantages that are hard to beat, especially for community reach. As for OpenAI potentially using the code, personally I don’t mind if my own code gets used for AI training.

    I’ll be using an MIT license, in case you’re curious. Everyone is free to mirror it anywhere.







  • Hey, thanks for the comment. I get that it might be used for something shady, but that’s not the intention. The primary goal is to clean up raw time-tracking data into a format that’s easy to present to clients or supervisors, especially for contexts when small gaps or irregularities should be absent.

    I imagine most professionals aren’t expected to account for every single minute of their workday. For example, if you’re switching tasks or taking short breaks. It’s more about reporting general productivity or overall progression of tasks, not trying to inflate hours.

    Anyone aiming for ‘time fraud’ could probably find easier methods. My focus is to make life easier for people who already track their work but want cleaner, more digestible reports.

    Appreciate the feedback though, helps me make sure the use case is clear! :)