roflo1
- 1 Post
- 6 Comments
roflo1@piefed.socialto
Linux@programming.dev•Are there ANY debuggers for Linux, that has a GUIEnglish
51·27 days agoWhat options have you tried that you find half-baked?
When I’m not in the mood for gdb’s CLI/TUI, I often use KDbg, Nemiver, or just good old CodeBlocks.
I do that very often. I’ve found that people’s expressions are a lot less “stiff” that way.
Edit: it’s entirely possible I started doing it after I read this comic for the first time.
roflo1@piefed.socialto
Photography@lemmy.ml•What thick BnW film for easy manual development ?English
3·2 months agoFunny. I actually prefer the plastic reels. I feel like the metal ball bearings (not present in the only metallic reel I ever owned) do all of the hard work for me.
Maybe it’s just what I got used to?
roflo1@piefed.socialto
Linux@lemmy.ml•What’s a graphical piece of software you wish existed or was better?English
3·2 months agoI’m intrigued.
Do you recall something in particular?
FWIW, I usually just connect to a ssh location from within Nautilus.
roflo1@piefed.socialto
Linux Questions@lemmy.zip•[solved] Why is there no .gz.tar?English
21·2 months agoI’ll try to explain it in another way. First, let’s talk about “semantics”:
Usually we assume that a tarball contains multiple files, and a gz is a single file compressed.
So a .tar.gz file is a single tarball that has been compressed.
A .gz.tar is understood to be a tarball containing a single gzipped file. But if that’s indeed what the file is, it doesn’t make much sense to tar it in the first place.
Moving on to what you really want to accomplish: you can certainly create many gz files and tar them, but we wouldn’t call it a .gz.tar file since tar doesn’t care about the format of the included files. Much like a bunch of compressed PDFs aren’t named .pdf.tar
Also, I’d like to point out that neither tarballs nor gzipped files are optimized for modifying.


I’d guess more like gopher