motherfucker [they/them, he/him]

motherfucker—gender neutral term for a biological parent with a feminine coparent

  • 4 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle





  • It’s not that militancy doesn’t have a place in the American left. It’s that a militia is not a drop in replacement for a union. There are currently good conditions for forming a union, at least the best there have been in decades. I don’t think the same is true of left-wing militias, at least not among everyday workers. If you’re in an area where you’re treated shittily enough and your local gun culture is amenable to forming a militia in your spare time amongst your coworkers, there’s a good chance that militia is not left-wing anymore. If nothing else, you’d need to identify a prominent social leader and start a strong ideological core with them. There’s a lot of luck involved in the conditions being right.

    I wanna be clear that that doesn’t mean people should avoid taking it seriously and considering it as an option. I just don’t think that most people will come to the conclusion that it’s feasible for them.


  • How much of that applies in practice is going to vary wildly from state to state. A militia marching in downtown Fresno is going to have a very different reaction to a militia marching in the exurbs of Jackson. Also, a truly militant trade union is going to be seen as a threat by the capitalists of any area no matter where you are and dealt with accordingly. Forming a union is a PR battle where your main advantage is the element of surprise. Honestly, if you can organize a bunch of Americans to form a secret militia long enough for that strategy to work, it feels like using it to negotiate for more vacation days is major under kill.




  • In my line of work, the office workers who interface with the people working on site are the ones with fat ass fucking paychecks. And as a result, it’s been harder to foster solidarity between them and the low-paid office workers, who are much more numerous. If anything, it should be the opposite, but because we’re under different vice presidents, that communication has designated channels which involve us reporting to our superiors (but for some reason the communication is not happening VP-to-VP, which defeats the purpose of the hierarchy argument). Literally, our communication would have primarily been happening through public channels, so it’s not like they couldn’t have monitored them. But I’m pretty sure what it is is that they don’t want us knowing each other and commiserating and they want to be able to blame the opposite group for their own managerial fuck ups when something goes wrong.