Who said that?

Your comments do that here because weightage isn’t accounted for.

It’s often also a trope in media articles where they write 10 paragraphs of what is wrong and then 2nd last paragraph is a passing reference to what likely is okay/good.

Which would be fair IF there was Equivalence in that Good and those 8 paragraphs of Bad.

One has to clarify the DEGREE when using terms like “Both Sides did Wrong”. It is not a given because a Given implies there IS Equivalence.

forgot the exact scoreline

Ya, when one doesn’t remember by how much they lost it must’ve been bad.

You seem to be arguing a different case/topic to what the OP was talking about.

A January born Male playing with a October (of same year) born girl is fair case for what you wrote.

But a January-born male playing with March-born girl is not really all that significant to be relevant. And that was the point of that comment in general.

Till testosterone hits young teenage boys the Physiological overhead boys have over girls is basically trivial (esp when accounting for selection in social activities like sport which will naturally filter similar physical profiles fitting the relative sports, i.e. taller children will be better at Basketball, even kids version of it).

Post testosterone hitting it’s game over though. No girl/women can compete physically with men (of a given age profile of course since 25-year-old female professional is not going to lose to a 80 year old retired man).

At the same time

Both Side-ISM is only credible when there is Equivalence.

There is none in this case. What some idiot said to another fan resulting in mass Police violence is NOT Both-Side did wrong X domain stuff.

Bad-ness exists on a gradient. If your solution to resolving that so called Bad (racist exchange) leads to what happened, then your solution is not only wank but itself a higher order of criminal than the original freaking Bad-exchange that started this (IF it is what happened).

So Brazil can’t host a match, can’t play proper football, can’t shithouse and if they are to be believed then can’t even bribe officials properly.

So what can Brazil do (obviously related to football, this isn’t about everything).

Edit: Fans also left early, so add can’t watch football to the list.

That exists anyway with PL sucking talent for those 50 leagues hence it’s not really a counter.

Super league opposition is a English/UK thing. People survey backs this up. The English fans seem to have a hostile attitude to it reaching nearing 92-95%, which is absurd in today’s world to have such uniformity on a partisan subjective thing.

Italy, Spanish opposition varies around 50-60% at Most. Meaning it’s easier to shift for them because their fans are already ready in enough numbers.

For the English this is like Hitler & then some if the numbers are a sign.

I missed Last Spurs match and I closed the stream on this one at 89th minute.

Seen a lot of PL this season so far but Yet to see a single goal scored on Spurs.

I am missing out on the drama.

One could have a 2 birds 1 stone approach by setting up a Minutes/Matches per 12 months Limit for players (NOT the clubs, who could play 200 matches a season if they want) and mandate that wages be per/Match (or per minutes, hour, etc. Can include availability in club training premises and so on).

The over-exertion thing is mitigated, the wages thing is addressed without destroying clubs & players ability to negotiate for themselves.

Clubs are happy since they get to play same number of fixtures (even more with Squad limits also increasing to say 30 or so).

Lowly teams will have higher odds over the season to create upsets since bigger teams won’t be playing best 11 every single fixture.

The only ones who’ll whine the most about these changes are the Fantasy League users.