• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2025

help-circle
  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzHow to cook a chicken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    It’s commonly known among sous vide cooking. The internal temp for sous vide beef is often <60C, and that makes some people nervous. However:

    https://www.americastestkitchen.com/articles/1131-is-sous-vide-safe

    First, let’s talk about what’s dangerous. A few types of bacteria in particular are responsible for most foodborne illness: Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni. Salmonella, a resilient group of bacteria that is most commonly found in poultry and eggs, is ingested by chickens, and then contaminates their muscle tissue, ­intestines, and ovaries. Salmonella can migrate into the muscle of chickens, meaning that they are contaminated not just on the surface but also inside the meat. Escherichia coli is a general group of bacteria that reside in the intestines of many animals, including humans. But if ingested, some strains of E. coli can wreak havoc. Campylobacter jejuni is a spiral-shaped bacteria that causes one of the most common diarrheal illnesses in humans in America.

    (Edit: emphasis added above)

    This may not be true with techniques like blade tenderization. That can transfer pathogens from the surface to the internals.

    Taenia saginata will die in only 5 minutes at 56C, which is quite a low temp even for sous vide. In fact, most beef jerky recipes will typically set the dehydrator’s temperature higher than that. It’s typical that slightly lower temps will work if it’s done for longer–jerky and sous vide usually takes several hours–but I don’t have a chart handy for taenia saginata specifically.













  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldJellyfin over the internet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Nah, setting non-standard ports is sound advice in security circles.

    People misunderstand the “no security through obscurity” phrase. If you build security as a chain, where the chain is only as good as the weakest link, then it’s bad. But if you build security in layers, like a castle, then it can only help. It’s OK for a layer to be weak when there are other layers behind it.

    Even better, non-standard ports will make 99% of threats go away. They automate scans that are just looking for anything they can break. If they don’t see the open ports, they move on. Won’t stop a determined attacker, of course, but that’s what other layers are for.

    As long as there’s real security otherwise (TLS, good passwords, etc), it’s fine.

    If anyone says “that’s a false sense of security”, ignore them. They’ve replaced thinking with a cliche.