If you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
If you have 0% accuracy in a binary decision, you could just always choose the other option and be right 100% of the time.
Viel Erfolg!
“Please show us on this map where the EU touched you.”
Brechmittel wären vielleicht einen Versuch wert.
Submit some posts yourself then instead of bitching!
They believe in a different version of the magic sky daddy.
Vor allem steht gerade bei ETFs besonders wenig zwischen Eigentümer und Eigentum. Der Overhead für die Verwaltung und das Potential für “Abzocke” ist besonders klein.
Und was hat das mit ETFs zu tun?
Where is EndeavourOS in this 😢
I used to be a huge Radiohead fan - the name is built from three album names:
OK Computer In Rainbows Kid A
These are great! I let DALL-E have a go at it:
And last year was an anomaly as well? Next year, the French nuclear plants will be repaired and their rivers will carry sufficient amounts of water again?
At least you chose an appropriate username.
By that logic, peanuts are also “incredibly dangerous”.
Note: I’m not promoting or condoning the consumption of energy drinks, they are generally unhealthy. But calling them “incredibly dangerous” because they can evoke such a reaction in a small subset of the population is bullshit.
“We can just ignore all the laws which is why we have ultimate freedom.”
I have the same issue with Sync.