I mean does this burn all copies of the “movie” in existence? Does this “remove” this project from ever being circulated and punish those who do it to the full extent of the law? Cause I don’t think so, so stop trying to liken my disapproval of word soup generation being called “art” with nazism and fascist ideology.
Also I can literally turn that point back to you, who are you to decide what is art? We’re literally Lemmy users arguing shit online, don’t try to take the high horse.
Don’t see why that’d be the case, they might focus on it being a lighter model or something that also happens to have lower specs
They want to join the single market, or do their manifesto says
Some rich person who doesn’t like her family getting their money from oil and is trying to do something good instead is one if the people funding them afaik
I’d argue you can go much cheaper. Also their real competitor in terms of standalone hmds is Meta, not beyond. Beyond is a niche pc only product, not a standalone experience with social potential.
Weren’t like a lot of serial killers in the 70s and 80s doing shit like that cause of sexual frustrations? Wouldn’t being castrated basically create more of that?
“artist” implies art is being made at some point, this ain’t it
Quest 3 adoption is super high compared to where quest 1 or 2 were at years ago, the apple vision pro wasn’t meant to create mass adoption anyway, not at that price point.
Well the good thing about their licensing is that you can buy a version and stick with it in spite of whatever the parent company does, and you’re not banned from using older versions like with Adobe’s T&Cs
Also if the ads were actually curated and we didn’t have crypto scams running amok
Everyone’s lives are going to shit and politicians looking for scapegoats blame immigration.
Read the article
But I don’t think companies are transparent enough with how they use things and usually ask for very broad licensing and usage rights for what you upload. Sure us tech literate people should and usually are scrutinizing that stuff, but what about the family aunt who just wants to share photos of their nephew with their close ones? On Facebook for example it even tells you you are only sharing posts with “Friends” or “Everyone” (or custom I guess) which might make those people think “oh just my friends see this, not the platform that I’m using”
Idk this kind of feels like victim blaming. Why should you expect your photos to be used in a way that is so devoid of the original purpose you shared them for? It’s like telling people to not go out of the house with money on them, you don’t expect to be robbed, so why should you have your entire way of living affected by it instead of punishing robbers when that does happen, or in this case companies that abuse good will.
“it was far away, it looked like a large black gun was being raised towards me”
Yeah, cause now the cheap competitor they could compare to just got pricier so that means they can also raise prices
Weird form of victim blaming
They’re the main server hardware supplier around, especially when it comes to new tech areas like generative technology and things that require a lot of computation.
They won’t care. The investors can’t think past next quarter.
Give more renewables at least the same incentives and funding oil is getting, and get more nuclear ready. Yes, nuclear is safe, look it up