But Henderson hasn’t done ‘A’. He’s just sold out to people who do ‘A’.

Thats a semantic argument that I don’t think too many people will swallow. You might want to google what tacit agreement means. “I’m not a bigot! I simply espoused equality and then…went to work for bigots. I also spout their PR and say what they tell me to say…but its totally different!”

If you buy that, I might interest you in some magic beans.

Your logic is astoundingly moronic.

My logic is astoundingly logical. You, however, have skipped too many stops on the logic train.

The comparison doesn’t hold. I’ve already explained why. “Worse” doesn’t come into it. It’s not relevant to why the comparison is awful.

“Person says A is a terrible thing and then does A.”

“Person says nothing public about B and then does B.”

I shouldn’t have to break it down that basic for you but apparently, you don’t get it unless I do.

“Are Liverpool fans not singing about Steven Gerrard any more?” was the qoute. The inference being that gerrard did bad things and is still a hero so why isn’t Henderson? For the reason I just explained.

It’s a terrible, terrible comparison.

But did he come out against violence and organised crime BEFORE he did those things?

I never claimed he wasn’t a dick. I claimed comparisons to Henderson were erroneous.

Thats…not my logic.

Are Liverpool fans not singing about Steven Gerrard any more?

Did Steven Gerrard make a big show of supporting LGBT and then fuck off to Saudia Arabia for money?

No?

Okay, then your comparison is pointless.