• 0 Posts
  • 265 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • Am I the only one who thinks protesting against your employer and causing a disruption in your workplace is a FAFO scenario?

    There was that woman a few years back (in the olde tymes, before the pandemic) who decided she wasn’t going to do her job when LGBT couples applied for marriage licenses. Everyone with an IQ over 80 rightly called her out for her bullshit.

    This isn’t really any different. You can’t support employees who exercise their individual freedoms to protest against an employer only when the cause is something you agree with.


  • Right, it needs the NPU because the data is stored and processed locally. Guess what, your computer/OS already knows everything you do.

    Yet another nothing-burger for the internet to rage about.

    I don’t use Windows for other reasons, but every useful application I use on a daily basis has some sort of history. Browsers remember pages I’ve visited, my editor has undo levels, terminal has a searchable scrollback buffer, my shell can recall pretty much every command I’ve ever run.

    And yet none of them work together. I’ve been thinking about Recall though, and I think the only use case I would have would be to have it summarize my daily activities on a work machine. Quite often I join morning standups, or a standup after a long weekend, and I’m like “wtf did I do yesterday?”. I’d love to have an AI remind me I spent 3 hours on Teams dealing with a co-worker’s issue, or how long I spent researching something in order to reply to an e-mail.

    Or when you notice you have a follow-up meeting on your calendar and you’ve completely forgotten what the action items you were supposed to handle from the meeting 2 weeks ago.

    Basically there’s a ton of QOL activities computers could be doing that require some sort of artificial intelligence to index and retrieve in order to be useful. That involves allowing some sort of local AI access to that data, but as long as the crowd of smooth brained luddites keeps whining that goal is getting further away…




  • The big problem with the US ruling though (unsure if the Canadian ruling was the same) is they got a yearly payment that was dependent on cigarette sales.

    Then the states borrowed against that future revenue.

    And when cigarette sales started to drop thanks to alternatives like vaping, suddenly the states were faced with the fact they might default on their loans as those yearly payments started to shrink. So what do they do? Work their ass off to ban vaping, claiming it’s “for the children”.