• binarypower@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    price per gb per watt hour = massive ripoff in operating expenses

    they use 6.08watts each… 12.16 watts for 300GB of storage is not good

  • False_Yobioctet@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It feels like a missed opportunity to still not reuse the velociraptor name for high end ssd’s or something.

    • Valor_X@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      True but after the Raptor they pretty much designated the “Black” label for high performance and gaming. I bought the 1TB Black when it first came out and it outperformed my 150GB 10kRPM Raptor even though it was only 7200RPM

    • TaserBalls@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      ok so that is like 4 people that did this and that is wild to me.

      Did you stroke your partitions or just raid?

  • Torley_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    DataHoarderNostalgia! I remember the reputation these had, and the cool name. Before SSDs, I was big into these.

    More background:

    https://louwrentius.com/an-ode-to-the-10000-rpm-western-digital-velociraptor.html

    For consumers and enthusiast, the Raptor was an amazing boot drive. The 74 GB model was large enough to hold the operating system and applications. The bulk of the data would still be stored on a second hard drive either also connected through SATA or even still through PATA.

  • zealeus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I finally deprecated my VelociRaptor 160GB last week. Was using it as a Linux boot drive for experimenting, but was time to get a cheap SSD for same task. She served me well for over a decade.

  • AcidAngel_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Aren’t any modern HDDs faster? Even 5400 rpm HDDs because when capacity grows one rotation of the disk will contain more data.

  • doodlebro@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have had a few without the icepacks for years now. They run so hot and I never built a system to deal with it. Please do a follow up comparing seek and read/write stats with modern fastbois.