• PizzaMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmao funny how you have to cite bullshit from a known propaganda factory

    It’s Stanford…

    that intentionally ignores the overwhelming majority of data

    For there being an “overwhelming majority of data” that supports your conclusion, you have yet to cite a single source. How strange.

    • TJD@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have, multiple fucking times, and all you do is dismiss them out of hand and try to pivot back to your constructed narrative, so why would I keep trying when you’ve overwhelmingly proven facts are irrelevant to your narrative?

      • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If I am being honest, I don’t remember the things you’ve cited in the past. I was talking about this thread.

        You using slurs and getting banned for it has been way more memorable.

        • TJD@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course you don’t remember the facts that are inconvienient to the narrative you want to push. Because the only reason you’re here is to push your worthless propaganda.

          • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Of course you don’t remember the facts that are inconvienient to the narrative you want to push.

            Nah, I just don’t have the time/energy to remember some sitation from several weeks ago from somebody who uses slurs for fun. I have better things to remember.

            Let me know when you have an actual argument for the gun debate.