• Blue_winged_yoshi@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins. United are having to budget carefully for FFP and they’ve blown a fortune on transfer fee/wages here!

    • jamieaka@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins.

      huh wasn’t thiago silva was a free transfer though?

    • Livinglifeform@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      United have even more money than chelsea, just chelsea sometimes actually sell players they’ve spunked away all their money on so they can spunk away some more money

    • ThatWontFit@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      I assume there is a /s here lol.

      We signed Silva on a free…and we also stay within FFP by selling/loaning players.

          • a_lumberjack@alien.topBEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            What part of that doesn’t mean giving a huge contract to an aging player is a risk? You seem to be arguing that it’s not a risk because he was signed on a free transfer.