vitzli-mmc@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 10 months agoHeads up for a data corruption bug in ZFS, few versions affected, might have started at 2.1.x, but many reports on 2.2.xgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHeads up for a data corruption bug in ZFS, few versions affected, might have started at 2.1.x, but many reports on 2.2.xgithub.comvitzli-mmc@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square3-2-1-backup@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agozfs --version also does the trick.
minus-squaretatiwtr@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThat did not work for me on ubuntu, but did on my debian/proxmox distribution proxmox: zfs-0.8.3-pve1 zfs-kmod-0.8.3-pve1 ubuntu: version: 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu26 srcversion: 0968F94158D646E259D86B5 vermagic: 4.4.0-142-generic SMP mod_unload modversions retpoline looks like im using an ancient version and am ok?
minus-squaregabest@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoI also use a version close to that, 0.something. See absolutely no reason to upgrade. It just works. It’s the version that has the fast scrub already.
zfs --version also does the trick.
That did not work for me on ubuntu, but did on my debian/proxmox distribution
proxmox:
ubuntu:
looks like im using an ancient version and am ok?
I also use a version close to that, 0.something. See absolutely no reason to upgrade. It just works. It’s the version that has the fast scrub already.