This article is from November 17th, so a couple days old, but I found it worthwhile.

  • jimbo_kun@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading through the list of consequences, the social consequences were probably a sufficient deterrent. Losing jobs and banned from football matches (the football association being distinct from the government).

    Not a fan of governments getting involved in prosecuting speech. I think social sanctions and consequences are more appropriate, even for heinous speech like this.

    • terryjuicelawson@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The odd thing is, what are these social consequences? Getting abuse and threats to the point of moving home is also something that needs acting on, surely. Or are they just deciding who can and can’t have abuse aimed at them?

      • jjw1998@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean they probably would act upon it but things like that are extremely easy to do anonymously, compared to being stupid enough to do what this guy did at a football match