• TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Voting for abolition ended slavery.

    During the civil war, not at the ballot box.

    Voting for pro civil rights party got us civil rights.

    After years of protests and violence, not at the ballot box.

    Voting for pro-labor politicians got us labor protections and the new deal.

    After years of social movements, strikes, violence and a the Great Depression. Not at the ballot box.

    Most significant political changes in America happen in the streets, not at the ballot box.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was obviously both. The violence without actually implementing the political policies would have been pointless.

      Show me an example where voting for the lesser evil leads to the adoption of more right wing policies. That is the specific claim you are supposedly defending.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not my opinion, it’s August Nimtz’s. I do agree with it though. FDR did the New Deal. Lincoln did the Emancipation, LBJ did civil rights. Public opinion was a factor, but it was the threat of social unrest that enacted them. As for the example of right wing policies, each Democrat caters to corporations. Maybe not as much as the Republicans, but they still do. After Reagan, we voted for the lesser evil Clinton, who did Welfare Reform and repealed Glass-Steagall. After Bush, we voted for the lesser evil Obama, and change. There was no change, he kept Bush’s surveillance state, did more drone strikes and the War on Terror. Promised healthcare, but borrowed it from Romney and the Heritage Foundation. Then after Trump, we settled for the lesser evil and Biden. Who promised his corporate funders that “nothing would fundamentally change.” We still don’t have healthcare, no campaign finance reform, no student loan forgiveness, scuttled a railroad strike, and is currently complicit in a genocide. If you think we are headed in the right direction; by all means vote for Biden. I see the systemic problems with the electoral duopoly and have no misconceptions that if we continue on this path, social unrest will facilitate the state to quell strikes, protests and riots. Business as usual never necessitates change, only the threat of violence from a social movement can do that. But we need to do that now, before it’s too late. I’m not telling you who to vote for, I will vote for Biden myself. But I’m under no illusion about the situation we are in, and what it takes to get out of it. I’m just disseminating information I found helpful and encouraging. It is better to be an informed electorate than an uninformed one.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You haven’t shown how Democrats led to a further move to the right compared to Republicans. For example, Obama tried to pass universal healthcare with a public option. Zero Republicans voted for it, and the public option was defeated by independent Joe Lieberman. If there were one more Democrat in the senate, we would’ve had universal healthcare.

          Meanwhile, Republicans under Trump literally tried to repeal Obamacare. The reason why progressive policies don’t pass is NOT because too many people vote for Democrats, but because too few do.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s ridiculously untrue. You’re looking at two examples.

              How about Civil Rights, the New Deal, Women’s suffrage, Pure food and drug act, the Meat Inspection act, Social Security, Medicare, the Sherman Act, Glass-Steagall Act, minimum wage laws, workers compensation laws, and on and on and on.

                • SkepticalButOpenMinded
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes because the American public shifted to the right post Reagan, in reaction to the Cold War and stagflation. Dems reacted by shifting to the median voter, to neoliberalism, especially because the left keeps listening to bad advice and staying home instead of voting.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You haven’t shown how Democrats led to a further move to the right compared to Republicans.

            They ain’t moving left.

            For example, Obama tried to pass universal healthcare with a public option. Zero Republicans voted for it, and the public option was defeated by independent Joe Lieberman. If there were one more Democrat in the senate, we would’ve had universal healthcare.

            Before Sinema, it was Manchin. Before Manchin, it was Lieberman. And if it wasn’t them, it would have been another Democrat. They’re always one vote away. Curious.

            The reason why progressive policies don’t pass is NOT because too many people vote for Democrats, but because too few do.

            Yeah, why do Progressives’ always have to ask for more rights and a better standard of living? Can’t they just be happy with the way things are?

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              None of these respond to my points. Democrats passed Obamacare. They were one vote away from going even further left with a public option. Meanwhile, Republicans were ALL votes away from any healthcare reform. Claiming that Democrats made the country go further right than Republicans is completely bizarre.

                • SkepticalButOpenMinded
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes it’s pretty disappointing. And even worse, during Trump, the US was much closer to repealing Obamacare than extending it.

                  But why describe this as Democrats coasting instead of blaming Republicans? Are you expecting Democrats to expand publicly funded healthcare without control of the House, and barely controlling the Senate with two conservative Dems?

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But why describe this as Democrats coasting instead of blaming Republicans?

                    Because they keep expecting gratitude for taking the plan Obama ran on and nerfing it down to what Clinton ran on. And not doing anything at all in the intervening years to improve it. It’s been 15 years. All we’re getting now is minor piddly shit that the party tarts up as the greatest thing in the history of mankind.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Is it? The Affordable Care Act was a palliative. It served its purpose of pretending to solve a problem, but making it worse. Life expectancy is declining, housing is becoming unaffordable, college tuition continues to rise, there’s a mental health epidemic. Even when Democrats have had control of Congress and the Presidency, nothing substantial changes. Maybe next time, right?

                • SkepticalButOpenMinded
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, the US should’ve also passed a public option. That would’ve made the US system very similar to those in Scandinavian countries (who don’t have single payer btw). But again the reason we didn’t get it is not because we had too many Democrats! Remember: that’s the extreme thesis you’re defending and providing no evidence for.

                  How do Scandinavian countries get their progressive policies? It’s not by voting for the right leaning party!

                  • drislands@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Thank you so much for your patient and clear defense of reason. The person you’re arguing with is certainly not arguing in good faith – they are constantly throwing out partial truths and never once addressing your actual point. You’re adding a lot of value in the way you’re commenting, and I salute you.

                  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That is not my thesis. My thesis is that it doesn’t matter if it is Republicans, or Democrats. You are never getting ranked choice voting. It is a threat to DNC control. The government is captured by corporations through special interests and lobbying. It’s never getting better with voting. Only with a social movement will things change.