UglyWanKanobi@alien.topB to Main@soccer.forumEnglish · 10 months agoChelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovichwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkChelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovichwww.theguardian.comUglyWanKanobi@alien.topB to Main@soccer.forumEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareNotClayMerritt@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThey can financially dope all they wish, but the players still have to perform, the manager still has to do a job. Money doesn’t buy competence or success.
minus-squareDiallingwand@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoIt clearly does. Believing that the wealthiest clubs aren’t consistently they most successful is denying reality.
minus-squareSpeechesToScreeches@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoYou could say the same for chemical doping…
They can financially dope all they wish, but the players still have to perform, the manager still has to do a job. Money doesn’t buy competence or success.
It clearly does. Believing that the wealthiest clubs aren’t consistently they most successful is denying reality.
You could say the same for chemical doping…