Research Identifies Factors That Make Correcting Misinformation About Science More Successful | The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org
On average, correcting misinformation in science did not succeed but a meta-analysis identifies factors that make them more successful.

tl;dr:

Although on average the corrections failed to accomplish their objectives, they worked better when the issue in the correction was emotionally more positive than the misinformation, the correction matched the ideology of the recipients, the issue was not politically polarized, and the correction provided abundant details as to why the earlier claims were false.

  • Vampiric_LumaEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Thank you :) meditation and mindfulness are great tools to do so.

    Trying to understand why meditation was so calming was what started this journey. I think that’s the best place to start if you’d like to find your patience.

    The Midnight Gospel is a fun way to expose yourself if you’d like to kill an hour watching trippy stuff happen while they talk about life. At the least it’s a trove of terminology to absorb. And its okay to cry on the mom episode if you make it…

    Regardless I hope you find your patience :) (And ty for your sacrifice dear mod 🖖)