With regards to null conditional operators, calling properties and methods will work fine, e.g.:
HttpContext.Current?.Response.Clear();
But I’m wondering if assignment is possible? I get this error when trying to do this:
HttpContext.Current?.Response.ContentType = "text/json";
The docs say:
The null-conditional operators are short-circuiting. That is, if one operation in a chain of conditional member or element access operations returns null, the rest of the chain doesn’t execute.
So wondering if it’s possible and I’m doing it wrong, or am I taking “does not execute” too literally? :)
a chain of member or element access
Assignment is not member access nor element access, hence not part of the chain.
Bummer, thought that might be the case, but was wishing it wasn’t because it seemed quite nice to avoid the ifs there as well.
What is the precise expected behavior here? If HttpContext.Current?.Response.ContentType is not null, then assign it to “text/json”, otherwise explode? I would intuitively evaluate the latter case as trying to assign
null = "text/json"which doesn’t make sense to me.What is the precise expected behavior here?
Oh just because the docs said “The null-conditional operators are short-circuiting” and “the rest of the chain doesn’t execute” I wondered, if the object is null, it would just skip executing the assignment completely. Didn’t have high hopes, but thought I’d ask just in case, as it would be kinda handy as well. Probably pretty rarely though.
What it does essentially is a null check and jump after each member.
So what you would end up with is null = … As the result of the expression (chain) is what is being assigned to. The assignment is an expression its self that takes two expressions. One to be assigned to and the value to assign.
Which obviously is always going to be an error.
I can see how you could think of the setter like
Current?.Response.set_ContentType("text/json")and then ifCurrentis null you just skip the assignment like you would any other method call.Yeah, for properties but not instance fields.
It’s not currently possible because the null conditional operator returns a value not a variable. Looks like there was some discussion on stack overflow and a GitHub issue was created a while ago but it hasn’t had much activity recently.
When there is ambiguity in the behavior of something like this, it’s usually easier to just construct a unit test and see what happens.
Make a class with some deeply nested members and then do an assignment.
See what happens.
