silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year ago$266 Trillion in Climate Spending Is a No-Brainer | Without the investment, the alternative is $2.3 quadrillion in accumulated damage by the end of the century.www.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down12
arrow-up1164arrow-down1external-link$266 Trillion in Climate Spending Is a No-Brainer | Without the investment, the alternative is $2.3 quadrillion in accumulated damage by the end of the century.www.bloomberg.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareAnonTwo@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoThere’s nothing silly about it. The people who matter in this argument only turn their heads to money.
minus-squarefederalreverse-old@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoBecause they are silly people. So yes, the tunnel view of the moneyed is completely silly.
There’s nothing silly about it. The people who matter in this argument only turn their heads to money.
Because they are silly people. So yes, the tunnel view of the moneyed is completely silly.