Stamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 1 year agoTrue to formstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1846arrow-down129
arrow-up1817arrow-down1imageTrue to formstartrek.websiteStamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down6·1 year agoNo you spell them the french way and to claim the french are right about anything is a crime against humanity.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoExcept for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoIts more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoUsing the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.
No you spell them the french way and to claim the french are right about anything is a crime against humanity.
Except for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
Its more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
Using the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.
Zedbra anyone?