• Freddichio@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yep - for all the shit Chelsea and United get (rightfully) for underperforming, there’s only so much that you can do when you’re missing basically an entire team’s worth of players.

    For a good few weeks, Chelsea and Manchester United could put out an “out XI” that was better than their starting XI…

    • SkinnyMc@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sorry, are you saying Chelsea and Man U are victims of inflated player prices resulting in top heavy squads? The team that spent a billion quid in a year and iirc the leading spender over the last decade?

      • Freddichio@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What? No, I’m not.

        I’m saying that while both teams should be performing better, there’s only so much you can do with so many injuries. You can have the best plans the world, but if half the team is out injured at any given time you’re never going to get a sense of consistency and it’s a case of “who can play” rather than “who should play”.