a perennial favorite topic of debate. sound off in the replies.

  • dom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you think this would impact R&D for corporations? ie if I’m a successful pharma company, I’m not going to pour money into research just for other companies to use it for “free” afterwards. Essentially it would hurt their incentive to create and invent.

    • fckgwrhqq2yxrkt@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are thinking of a patent, which protects a process or way of doing something. Copyright protects creative works.

    • TacoRaptor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ignoring the difference between copyright and patents, this is exactly the kind of motivation I’m looking to prevent! The idea that the only driver of invention and creativity is the profit motive is corporate propaganda. Humans have, from our evolution, always been driven to invent and create to make our lives easier.

      Using the example of pharma company, if a hypothetical company with infinite funds and resources for their R&D group wants to develop a new drug that cures cancer, despite having infinite input, they will still never produce anything if they don’t have people to do the work of research and development. A media company like Disney, despite their vast wealth, cannot produce movies without writers, animators, voice actors, production crews, etc. This is my reason for people being the only ones able to own a copyright. (Edit to fix a typo)