When it comes to age on the ballot, Texas didn’t wait until 2024 to weigh in.

Asked to let judges stay on the bench until they’re 79 years old — a year younger than President Joe Biden — Texas voters soundly rejected the proposal in Tuesday’s elections, a defeat that drew new attention to issues of age and fitness for office in the U.S.

“Age is front of mind for American voters in a way that it has not traditionally been and they are nervous about it,” said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University.

Others cautioned against broader takeaways. At least four other states have rejected similar proposals over the last decade, according to the National Center for State Courts. And states that have passed the measures have mostly done so in close votes.

  • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The problem isn’t dementia, the problem is that they won’t live to see the consequences of their actions.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s hardly the problem, imo.

      “A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall not never sit.”

      Many of our actions will have consequences that will outlive us. The question is whether the institution is well equipped to behave ethically and just. One of he contributing factors is that all justices are of sound mind, regardless of age.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The consequences of your actions will affect your great-grandkids but you’re unlikely to be alive to see it happen.

      Does that mean you should be cancelled as well?