Speaking with IGN, disabled players explored how Xbox's changes to third-party accessory allownace will impact their setups, the overall cost of their equipment, as well as money lost, and the ways in which the community is reacting.
Because that’s what they want? What else would it be? This isn’t something that beneficial for the community no how you attempt to swing it.
I’m not yelling, I’m correcting someone who is attempting to defend a volatile decision. But if that’s what you want to assume, clearly you never came here in good faith either, goes both ways.
Whenever someone proof of their idea is ‘why else?’ they aren’t trying to have a discussion because they already stated that they have no intention of looking at other opinions. You are making just as much if not more assumptions.
And I made a comment on the post, you replied to my comment. The both ways argument doesn’t really fit here.
We were having a discussion before that phrase and since you’ve pointed out we weren’t I stopped. So to call that out after is extremely disingenuous… however….all I wanted was to see how you came to the conclusion that this was an error on Microsoft’s part, when part of their policy is to allow ONLY first party devices.
That means ones that have paid a fee and gotten their stuff tested. They’ve told you their intentions, and you want to claim I’m making it up? Good lord read some articles about this before spouting your opinion maybe if that’s the case.
You made a comment in a public forum, people responding and wanting to have discussions go hand in hand…. Or why else would you be commenting…? To be heard by others but not wanting to listen back? Yeah that’s coming in with good faith lmfao.
Because that’s what they want? What else would it be? This isn’t something that beneficial for the community no how you attempt to swing it.
I’m not yelling, I’m correcting someone who is attempting to defend a volatile decision. But if that’s what you want to assume, clearly you never came here in good faith either, goes both ways.
Whenever someone proof of their idea is ‘why else?’ they aren’t trying to have a discussion because they already stated that they have no intention of looking at other opinions. You are making just as much if not more assumptions.
And I made a comment on the post, you replied to my comment. The both ways argument doesn’t really fit here.
We were having a discussion before that phrase and since you’ve pointed out we weren’t I stopped. So to call that out after is extremely disingenuous… however….all I wanted was to see how you came to the conclusion that this was an error on Microsoft’s part, when part of their policy is to allow ONLY first party devices.
That means ones that have paid a fee and gotten their stuff tested. They’ve told you their intentions, and you want to claim I’m making it up? Good lord read some articles about this before spouting your opinion maybe if that’s the case.
You made a comment in a public forum, people responding and wanting to have discussions go hand in hand…. Or why else would you be commenting…? To be heard by others but not wanting to listen back? Yeah that’s coming in with good faith lmfao.
Hey there, @[email protected] and @[email protected]!
As a mod around here, could you please drop this conversation. It is clear that this is going nowhere at this point and it will only escalate further.
Thank you!
Removed by mod
Removed by mod