• Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty insidious to claim the judge is biased because of a $100 donation.

    When he is likely found guilty he will just delegitimise the verdict and his base will eat it up.

    • ma11en@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because he would have sold the farm and it’s nuclear secrets for $100

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will anyway. It doesn’t really matter what happened or what any facts are, if it doesn’t go his way, they will say it was fake blah blah blah and so will he.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They couldn’t throw $10,000 between the all of them to make this argument look kind of legitimate?

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This case isn’t civil. If he’s found guilty in this case he’ll be making that claim to himself from inside a prison cell.