• concealmint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    You would be right. If the government were to never get involved. “It’ll take decades for the whole country to prepare for nuclear fallout” “It’ll take decades for the country to protect itself from HIV” etc. etc. Every public health crisis needs to the government to get involved and mediate, that’s what civilization has been since the time of the Greeks.

    • tallwookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s not in the government’s interest to royally fuck the economy back into the shitter, which is what rushing the transition from petroleum to more sustainable resources will do.

      lol you think covid shortages were bad? international shipping, domestic train shipping, and local truck shipping ALL USE DIESEL - almost exclusively. merely changing all fuel systems without significant interruption to supply (untold millions dying of starvation) will will take decades - that’s WITH the government taking action.

      • concealmint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The government’s interest is protecting it’s own system. If their has to be loss in profits for oil companies than so be it. Also you’re implying that the first to go off Diesel would be the supply line when obviously not. It would be power grids, the army then consumer cars than the supply chain. Do you think that any one with a functioning brain would try to make the supply lines go green first? You’re just doing a strawman.

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your trains use diesel? Tf? I’m pretty sure almost all trains these days run on electricity.