I noticed this a few years ago and forgot about it. How concerning is this?

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    We had a glulam beam replaced under home insurance that wasn’t as bad as that.

    Go hire a structural engineer to inspect it though, that’s what we did. Helped immensely with our claim too.

    • Another Person @lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s in the garage above the garage door. Elsewhere in this thread I have more photos. (Sorry I’m new to let me and not good at directly linking on mobile)

    • nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The beam contains the center of tree which is prone to checking. The load bearing properties of the beam are predominantly on the outer sides not the center.

      Seen enough deck posts on reddit to gather this is common and more of an aesthetic thing. Obviously you can ask a structural engineer for a real opinion. But this does not look all that concerning.

      I’d be more concerned that your garage door spring is not enclosed. Those things get nasty when they pop.

        • nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry I was thinking of a garage door “safety cable” which is not applicable to the spring in the picture. I will fix my post to avoid further confusion.

          • JebediahMilkshake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No worries! Tbh an enclosed (or at least shielded) garage spring is not a bad idea, although would be more difficult to inspect and work on in the event it’s needed.