So I guess I’m wondering if this community is intended to be about photography, as in the discussion of photography, or if it’s going to be like r/itookapicture was on Reddit. I absolutely don’t think that we need to replicate what they did on that other site, but those were two very different places with very different purposes. They’re both valuable, but I think that they’re valuable in different ways and it might be good to separate them from each other in some fashion.

  • wmrch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why decide on a direction in the first place? I’d just let it run and see what the users make of it.

  • Photographer@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it should be for photography more serious than “i took a picture” but I’m not gatekeeping content right now, let’s just share images and build a community. Posts about photography, including photography blogs are welcome as long as you don’t spam. I’m open to community suggestions.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a lot of communities start out as a single group for a wide range of content related to a topic like photography, including gear talk, photos, industry news, howtos, etc… When they get to a certain size, discussions start getting lost in the flood of content and it makes sense to fork more specialized sub-communities.

      Forking too early leads to a bunch of dead communities with a handful of posts.

  • 0933@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think setting up walls at this point, like, “You can’t share pictures here— do that over at XYZ”, will only discourage people from joining the community. Maybe as activity picks up and more people want to have a stand-alone, “critique my photo” community, then they can do that.