Could they have differentiated pricing between apps that helped build / give back to the community and API requests which were just harvesting data?
Alternatively they could have milked the community more effectively by slowly boiling the frog as more effective companies and governments do.
Slowly ramp API prices over a period of time so the apps die off and most user’s begrudgingly accept the changes without a cliff edge which leads to protests and a mass exodus
From a personal point of view I am pleased for the nudge I needed to move out of corporate social media.
That’s pretty standard licensing. “If you’re using the API to train an AI model, the price is $100. If you’re making an app for regular users, the price is $0.01.”
Could they have differentiated pricing between apps that helped build / give back to the community and API requests which were just harvesting data?
Alternatively they could have milked the community more effectively by slowly boiling the frog as more effective companies and governments do.
Slowly ramp API prices over a period of time so the apps die off and most user’s begrudgingly accept the changes without a cliff edge which leads to protests and a mass exodus
From a personal point of view I am pleased for the nudge I needed to move out of corporate social media.
That’s pretty standard licensing. “If you’re using the API to train an AI model, the price is $100. If you’re making an app for regular users, the price is $0.01.”