tbh i’m not even sure why the muslim brotherhood is considered “bad”. I’ve heard good things about them - they elected that morsi fellow right? they were pro-democracy, but socially conservative. Morsi went to iran and criticized them for not being democratic… in TEHRAN. man had balls.
The Muslim Brotherhood is bad because of political violence associated with it, Islamist (think Saudi-level) but different school of thought). Just because you encourage democracy doesn’t make you a good group.
Forget the sects, it’s basic politics. The Muslim Brotherhood is an ideology that opposes monarchies.
Monarchies hate them.
tbh i’m not even sure why the muslim brotherhood is considered “bad”. I’ve heard good things about them - they elected that morsi fellow right? they were pro-democracy, but socially conservative. Morsi went to iran and criticized them for not being democratic… in TEHRAN. man had balls.
There’s a pretty good thread about them here with a lot of different viewpoints if they’re ‘bad’ or not: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMiddleEast/comments/y6589v/thoughts_on_the_muslim_brotherhood/
IMO they’re mostly just incompetent, and I’m opposed to theocracies in general.
The Muslim Brotherhood is bad because of political violence associated with it, Islamist (think Saudi-level) but different school of thought). Just because you encourage democracy doesn’t make you a good group.
? it literally does.
political violence is associated with palestinians and muslims generally in western media and zionist narratives anyways.
for instances, y’all think jihad is a terrorist slogan, as is allah hu ackbar. *rolleyes*
So gimme a break with that “associated with political violence”. That’s so ambiguous as fuck.
By your logic, the United States is a compassionate nation because they encourage democracy. Many would argue the opposite.
Lamo that isn’t true. Muslim Brotherhood is not a a political terrorist group.
“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”