Can’t even seek through songs.

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such a lame excuse. If the company never turned a profit - they shouldn’t exist anymore. Not shittify their service till nobody uses it.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        A hacked client on the free tier is also a decent experience.

        This month’s expenses:-

        • Concert tickets: $350
        • Vinyl records: $100
        • Pirating Spotify: $0

        I think I’m winning.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is they haven’t turned a profit even with people having premium. So what’s the reason for them to exist

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the case with a lot of companies. Facebook didn’t turn a profit for 10 years or something that sounds equally crazy.

          • mcqtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s more or less the problem (one of many problems I suppose). Companies seem to think it’s a good business model to burn money collecting a user base and then turn all their free users into paying users down the line.

            Think drug dealers. They wanna be that.

            • Risk@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              The analogy to a drug dealer is on point. They’re relying on users being hooked on their dopamine outlet.

            • reinar@distress.digital
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              it’s like this to eliminate competition, any alternative has to fund marketing costs + unsustainable pricing, while Spotify will be running their ponzi scheme, effectively leveraging their market position.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m absolutely not defending Spotify or any other capitalist entity, but profit by no means constitutes a reason to exist. I know plenty of people who have never turned a profit and in fact accrued debt who are far more valuable than any executive at Spotify.

          I just don’t give a shit if Spotify or any major labels exist. I buy records and merch from independent labels run by people that actually have a soul.