SEE SECOND EDIT DOWN BELOW

Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.

Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the “Loli” announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.

Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?

There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?

edit: UPDATE

Take this update as you will

I’m taking it as a backtrack, but it’s still not an instance I want to associate with.

Lots of people keen to offer their opinion of drawn picture of naked kids, haven’t seen any alternatives though

Edit 2: At this point I think their updated rules are good. It took a bit to get there, but in the end they appear to be taking a hard stance. Hopefully this is enforced.

I dont think it was a case of “whoops bad English” like they are suggesting, I think it was a total 180 backflip. This doesnt really instill confidence in the admins IMO, but im happy that they have made the right decision in regards to allowed content. Hopefully this is was just some early wobblies and the community can move on.

  • nude@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Japanese culture can do what it wants.

    I and the majority of other people just don’t want to be browsing and come across pictures of naked kids.

    Call me crazy, I know

    • lynny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one will blame you for blocking the sub. Calling loli/shota “child porn” however is quite a bit over the line. It’s like calling someone you disagree with a Nazi/Commie, it diminishes the term into nothingness, just look at the current state of the word “woke”.

      Can we at least save terms like “pedophile” and “child porn” for people who are actually pedophiles and are actually consuming something that required someone to be hurt?

      • nude@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bud, you call a picture of a nude kid whatever you want.
        I’ll call it whatever I want

        • lynny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Going around accusing people of serious stuff like consuming child porn is impolite at best, malicious at worst. You can do whatever you want, but throwing around accusations only causes consternation within communities. Why do you think places like Twitter are so toxic?

          If you don’t like what the sub is doing you should block it and move on, there’s no reason to get so upset over drawings even if you find them disgusting. There’s plenty of stuff I find disgusting that people do, but if I spent my time getting upset about that I’d have no time to enjoy my life.

          It’s healthier for everyone involved for people to live and let live.

          • nude@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, you jerk off to pics of kids youre going to have to learn to cop it on the chin.

            Besides that, the enitre point of this post is to warn people about that instance and ask for alternatives.

            All you pedos and apologists showing up to defend pictures of naked kids are just kicking up a stink that no one cares about