- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
The “motivation” section:
This just sounds like a NAS with extra steps, and none of the ‘own your data’/data security (companies can kill your account at any time, for literally any or no reason at all). Grabbing your data and actually moving to a system that you truly own is the best course of action here; this is like a band-aid solution for a shotgun wound, unless I’m missing something. I guess it might make the move easier, but if you never actually cut ties from the companies holding your data… what’s the point?
It sounds like git-annex to me (doesn’t have to be 3rd party hosts, you can combine your own systems) where it allows decentralized file management across all your devices. I’d also be curious to see how they handle offline backup/file tracking and the sneakernet use cases (something git-annex supports). As it sounds like it is a true filesystem, it could be a nice upgrade assuming feature parity (one gotcha with git-annex, is since it is using git, you can’t easily have other git repositories inside of it).