• xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Maybe not for other laws, but it makes sense for drugs. The important thing is that people should have the right to breathe non-poisonous air, and forcing smokers to hide their smoking achieves that.

    • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This ban is on the sale of menthol infused cigarettes. It wouldn’t criminalize smoking menthols and there’s plenty of other ways to infuse cigarettes with menthol or buy a synthetic alternative.

      If your point is at all that this prohibition would in any way, shape, or form help fulfill that goal, that is incorrect.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you read the comment chain, we’ve been talking about drug prohibition in general, not this specific ban.

        • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve read the comment chain, it just seemed like you were implying that this ban would achieve some kind of beneficial outcome.

          It’s fine if I’m wrong, that’s okay. I’ll take that loss. That’s not my point. I just think this ban has no positive effects whatsoever and I’m just hoping people realize that if true.