cliché question, but hey why not?

  • Ugly Bob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian, because I know they won’t pull a redhat ever. They do things the right way for things that matter.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been on Ubuntu since forever but I’m seriously considering debian. What, in your view, would be the biggest advantages (or disadvantages, if any) for debian over ubuntu?

      • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Drivers and kernel modules. Debian with “proprietary drivers enabled” works on about as much stuff as Ubuntu without proprietary drivers enabled. I’ve never got it working without issues on a laptop. You’ll definitely be avoiding drivers that probably have government backdoors if you’re using Debian but it comes at a price.

        Arch is ironically easier to deal with in this regard. To give credit where credit is due, Debian is very stable. Once you install it on a sever, it won’t break on its own. It may be harder to get all your hardware working but once you do, if you never upgrade you’ll never have to mess with it again.