• SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The opposite of skeletons in your closet is no skeletons in your closet, not skeletons in the front yard. LOL

    • mozingo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      He said “Idiom continuity”. That doesn’t mean they all have to be opposites, he’s just extending the metaphors in whatever direction he fancies.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just realized that going up in flames and going down in flames are both very bad.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “going sideways” is also bad. I guess the moral of that idiom is that directions are bad?

    I guess “going forwards intact” would be the good version.

    • Pandantic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “going sideways” is also bad.

      “Going forward in flames” is what it should be. You’re in flames, but you’re not going up, down, or sideways (all bad), but just going forward knowing the flames will probably subside.

  • Pandantic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Up shit creek with a paddle” - you’re in trouble, but you’ve got the means to get through it (tho it will stink)

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it’s continuity, like a spectrum. At one end is thin ice, the other is thick ice. etc

      • elegantgoat1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I think that’s wrong. Since they are discrete and not a continuum. Since there are only two extremes.

        If his new relationships were true it would make the opposite idioms consistent with their non-opposite counterparts. Kind of the same concept as a contrapositive proposition, i.e. ‘if A then B’ implies ‘if not A then not B’.