A follow up from my previous post on book 1

I do have to apologise ā€¦ this rant turns out to be pretty negative


So finished book 2 last night, just writing some off the cuff thoughts.

Thoughts on the show

First, I think Iā€™m settled now in being a show fan first, which Iā€™m sure is odd or strange for many book fans. But, for the first two books, I prefer the show and think itā€™s doing a good job at adapting the books. Reading the books after seeing the show has made me miss things the show did and understand the challenge the show has had not just with compressing things into a tight TV schedule but managing the difficulties of adapting these books which include, IMO, pretty glaring flaws or at least awkward elements. Unfortunately, Iā€™ve now got a pretty clear prejudice against book fans that heavily criticised or hated the show ā€¦ with all of the understanding/sympathy in the world, I think they just werenā€™t ready to watch an adaptation and werenā€™t being reasonable about how good or bad the first two books are.

Rest of season 2

Otherwise, for the rest of season 2, Iā€™m in a curious position. I know how the second book ends, and so can see some of where the show is headed, but itā€™s also going in some other directions almost certainly influenced by later books. Iā€™m guessing itā€™s bringing in a lot of book 3, and from what I can tell about where book 3 sits in the series (IE, it was supposed to be shorter and kind of wraps up this opening act of the series) Iā€™m guessing itā€™s going to try to wrap adapting all of book 2 and 3 ā€¦ so in a way I donā€™t really know whatā€™s going to happen, which is cool, except Iā€™m betting Egwene gets rescued and maybe something about Fain gets revealed? Will we get a battle in the sky though, will Lanfear kinda help Rand??

Thoughts on the book itself

So, for me, I lump book 2 along with book 1. Overall, itā€™s a somewhat clumsy and seemingly rushed intro into the world and the series, probably written under a cloud of doubt and with an urge to publish quickly. I rank book 2 lower than book 1, largely because I donā€™t think it achieves much and feels a lot like set up and info dump without a clear purpose or coherent story in its own right. For me, the sudden appearance of Moraine at the end, after Lanfearā€™s sudden appearance and revelation, both with some info dump, along with Rand just jumping around the map without any real clear reason as to why it was happening, was all rather telling.

Reading it, I got the impression that the book was the clumsy/bad adaptation of the show (honestly serious). Like, Rand magically falling into the portal world and having a slightly B-tier fantasy sequence with Selene, who was obviously dodgy and likely lanfear, seemed like a cheap vehicle to get Rand to Cairhien. The portals then seemed like a cheap mechanism to get Rand to Falme while also being able to have the revelation of Machin Shin kinda following him. The whole multiple worlds and multiverse of timelines seems like it was supposed to be telling us something, at least thematically, maybe leading up to Randā€™s certainty that heā€™s never sided with the dark one in a past life. But it never hit for me ā€¦ all I can hope for is that it comes up again in the series. The deal with Fain being mysteriously evil and yet not concluding it in anyway through plot in the book to then be clarified by a Moraine info dump, again felt like Jordan just needed this to be clear for later stories and didnā€™t quite know how to do it.

Despite the kinda cringey super saiyan deus ex machina ending of book 1 ā€¦ we get ā€¦ another super saiyan ending in book 2? Fighting in the sky with magic swords or something again? Despite having blown the horn, the outcome of the battle still somehow depended on Rand winning the match? Also, somehow, out of no where, Rand is a master swordsman against Turak (and Baā€™alzamon)? In the first book, I guess we can infer that the ending was intended by Baā€™alzamon ā€¦ but I donā€™t know what Iā€™m supposed to glean from his fight in book 2 ā€¦ is Rand just powerful now without much explanation cuz ā€œDragonā€ ā€¦ cuz thatā€™s how it feels.

Personally, these are not satisfying endings, and the ending of season 1 compares rather favourably to both of the first two book endings. For a series that is celebrated for its magic system, and by implication not having a bad soft magic system, the first two books literally end with Rand being able to do things mostly involving flying in the sky like Goku that make no sense and have no set up other than ā€œitā€™s his fate to fight in the final battleā€. I say that as someone whoā€™s rather fond of soft magic systems ā€¦ but this literal deus ex machina stuff is the cardinal sin of soft magic and is not working for me it all. Like when the horn was blown, and hereos came out of nowhere swearing allegiance to Rand, even though thatā€™s what the horn is supposed to do ā€¦ and then Baā€™alzamon appears out of nowhere and Rand starts fighting ā€¦ I was honestly thinking ā€¦ ā€œreally?!ā€

Sense of the series over all

Iā€™m hoping my general contextual critique is accurate, and that these first 3 books are really an introduction that arenā€™t representative of the series because they werenā€™t written with the knowledge that the series was going to happen.

I always set out to read at least up to book 4 (and hopefully book 6), as many say thatā€™s when the series actually starts (Iā€™m guessing itā€™s the beginning of the second act of the series) ā€¦ and I will still do so ā€¦ as the first two books have definitely set up a very interesting world that Iā€™m a fan of already.

Looking ahead though, Iā€™m starting to wonder about the series as a whole. The slog is well known (however controversial), and Iā€™m already starting to write off books 1-3. So, itā€™s a 14 book series, where 1-3 are clumsy/flawed set up (my critique ATM) and 7-10 are ā€œslogā€, leaving 4-6 and 11-14 ā€¦ so itā€™s a more or less conventional double trilogy book series?? I know Iā€™m being harsh here (and uninformed!!), and maybe Iā€™m just bitter from book 2, but Iā€™m starting to wonder how much the whole ā€œthe series doesnā€™t start until book 4, oh and thereā€™s a slog 3 books laterā€ is way too casually brushed off ā€¦ like I think I would have preferred a greater warning about what books 1 and 2 are and feel somewhat mislead. Maybe I just donā€™t like Jordanā€™s style ā€¦ Iā€™m definitely curious to find out, but I feel like the first two books have structural issues that deserve (from the little Iā€™ve seen) more commentary.

Back to the show

Thing is, as I said, Iā€™m a show fan first, and itā€™s actually the show that has set up the world for me with the books kind of being an awkward supplemental of additional detail.

For instance, Egwene in Falme is awesome in the show, and it felt like Jordan didnā€™t quite appreciate the depth of the character moment he had created, with her being tortured etc kinda being brushed over as mostly info dump ā€¦ except of course when Egwene is free and loses her shit, which was a very nice way of clearly showing the effect of her experience, but also felt somewhat contrived because we had to infer how bad it must have been for her. In the show, if they free her, I am going to feel her liberated rage when she realises what vengeance she can do.

Generally, the character development of the girls is wonderful in the show and Jordanā€™s treatment shows its sexism age. THe amount of talk of who gets to marry Rand, as well as hair combing ā€¦ was pretty cringe. Also, the seanchan do not come off as brutal in this book as I think book fans remember, itā€™s often very after the fact when I feel like at least one clear depiction would have been rather impactful.

Fleshing out Liandrin and Moraine and Lanfear in season 2 has been awesome as well ā€¦ really smart choices it seems. Even leaving out Perrinā€™s wolfbrother stuff with Elyas until season 2 seems smart in hindsight as he is pretty much not a focus of book 2.

General story thoughts and questions

Ok, so what was baā€™alzamonā€™s plan? Without getting into more critique of the books, because I could be really off base here ā€¦ but either the book is being intentionally mysterious, or I totally missed something, but I did not feel like baā€™alzamon was a threat in this? Is the idea that many things surprised him ā€¦ Fainā€™s extra double shadow nature ā€¦ Lanfearā€™s interference ā€¦ Mat blowing the horn? When Ingtar revealed he was the darkfriend I had already forgotten about the prologue and that he was the obvious candidate ā€¦ largely I think because it really wasnā€™t clear that any plan was pushing things around too much.

Putting the show together with the books ā€¦ Iā€™m guessing itā€™s a relatively big reveal later on in the books that the dark one is actually just Ishamael (which has been fairly clearly hinted at in the books). The show seems to have no cared for that mystery too much (which Iā€™ve liked) ā€¦ Iā€™m curious to see where it goes and for what purpose in the books.

Iā€™m pretty sure itā€™s me ā€¦ but I am not feeling the whitecloaks at all as an element of the world. Their involvement in book 2 was confusing to me ā€¦ did I miss something? But also, I guess I just donā€™t like Fanatical Christian tropey stuff.

From book 1, I was always curious if Shadar Logoth and the Ways would become things ā€¦ and Iā€™m pleased to see that they are. Fain being a Shadar creature, that is so against the dark that it is its own kind of dark is super cool to me. And Machin Shin and Siadin are some sort of thing ā€¦ right?! That the seanchan are an alternative forked culture was also super cool ā€¦ I just wish it was more fleshed out in some way ā€¦ and Iā€™m guessing they come back and are a permanent part of the world.

Generally, as any WoT fan probably things, the diversity of cultures and angles especially on what ā€œthe darkā€ even is wonderful! Going on from that, I feel like the book is trying to hint at me that the relationship between the Dragon and the Dark is not so clear cut. For instance, I wouldnā€™t be surprised if thereā€™s a revelation that Ishamael and the Dragon have had their roles reversed in previous ages. This is probably whatā€™s keeping me in the series the most ā€¦ what is Jordan going to do with his ā€œevilā€ and ā€œheroā€ dynamic here.

  • abraxas@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think from this and previous posts of yours, part of your issue is not jiving well with Jordanā€™s writing style. That you consider Egweneā€™s experiences an ā€œinfo dumpā€ might be suggestive. Jordan fought in the Vietnam War as a machinegunner. There is no doubt he had the weight of having killed people and watched people suffer on his soul when he wrote the Wheel of Time. To many of us, Egweneā€™s suffering in the books was heart-wrenching. While IMO the show did it Justice, everyone (including Rafe vaguely) commented on the importance of getting that scene right to achieve the full horrific intention behind it. For most of us, we donā€™t get out of that scene just hating the Seanchan. They literally nauseate us.

    A lot of folks consider tGH to be one of the stronger books in the series, far stronger than tWoT. Yes, there was a lot of world-building, and a lot of prepwork. Itā€™s where the ā€œgreat foreshadowingā€ started, that Jordan is so famous for, foreshadowing most people miss the first readthrough.

    I do agree that Jordanā€™s villains are shown more two-dimensional in the books (at least early ones) despite the potential depth they could have. He liked there being a clear bad guy that you donā€™t really sympathize for because they have it coming. Maybe from his military experiences? I dunno.

    Ok, so what was baā€™alzamonā€™s plan? Without getting into more critique of the books, because I could be really off base here ā€¦ but either the book is being intentionally mysterious, or I totally missed something

    Jordan is definitely like an onion. Baā€™alzamonā€™s plan is clear on a reread. And the show is straight-out saying it. He wants to destroy everything and end existence, and he can only do it if something goes different. There have been an infinite pasts where they fought, and in every one of them, the Dark One failed to completely win in some way or anotherā€¦ but so too did the Dragon. You saw alternate realities that, on the surface, seem to show the Dark One having won, but (not really a spoiler) if you pay careful attention, he hadnā€™t won in those alternate realities eitherā€¦ because his goal is to destroy everything, and clearly there are still things in those realities.

    Remember, Baā€™alzamon is utterly and completely insane. Thatā€™s an undercurrent of everything he does, and that was left out of the show (for good reasons, IMO).

    Putting the show together with the books ā€¦ Iā€™m guessing itā€™s a relatively big reveal later on in the books that the dark one is actually just Ishamael

    Yeah. Baā€™alzamon is also the guy youā€™ve been seeing in the show ;). Itā€™s not REALLY a huge reveal, since Jordan intended most readers to have guessed it by the time it happens. It also happens fairly soon in your reading. Not a huge spoiler, since itā€™s so obvious as a watcher. Thatā€™s actually what I was dodging around in earlier discussions with you because I didnā€™t know if you realized they were one and the same.

    but I am not feeling the whitecloaks at all as an element of the world. Their involvement in book 2 was confusing to me ā€¦ did I miss something? But also, I guess I just donā€™t like Fanatical Christian tropey stuff.

    The Whitecloaks operate out of Amadicia ( see proximity on map ). They very recently lost a play for power that would have put them in the same league as Andor in terms of overall land and might. Theyā€™re still butt-hurt about that. Because Amadicia shares borders with Tarabon, they have a vested interest in controlling/brokering in the war between Tarabon and Arad Domon. Tomon Head and Falme were in the disputed territories, so ANOTHER force, a mysterious force that wields the yucky evil naughty One Power showing up is a Big Deal ā„¢ to them. They expected to kill two birds with one stone by dealing with them. If they brought in both nations under their control, that puts them back in Major Player status, if not as well as had previous conquests gone off correctly.

    But from the above, theyā€™re heavily weakened from that war they recently lost. So their leader Pedron Niall, one of the Great Generals, has been very careful regarding the outlay of troops. Geofram Bornhald is arguably his most trusted commander, and is sent there mostly to be peacekeeping and ā€œsolve problems to win brownie pointsā€. You know the monkey wrench Jaichim Carridin introduced by this point, obviously. Taking a step back, you will be learning a LOT more about the Whitecloaks and their intentions in upcoming books. Jordan often wrote what happened, and then filled in all the blanks through dialog that happens books later.

    Fanatical Christian trope? Yes. But with the interesting angle that Jordan himself was a faithful Christian. If you watch the Whitecloaks carefully, they do bumble through doing some correct things. Thereā€™s a huge ā€œmemory testā€ scene in Lord of Chaos that proves that Whitecloaks actually do sometimes succeed at rooting out and killing darkfriends. Itā€™s just the fanatical thatā€™s wrong.

    From book 1, I was always curious if Shadar Logoth and the Ways would become things ā€¦

    Iā€™m pretty positive thatā€™s still going to happen, ditto with some Ways-related stuff. But I agree that I was surprised it didnā€™t happen in S2. It was an interesting choice to make Ishy take Fainā€™s role in S2. It works, though.

    Generally, as any WoT fan probably things, the diversity of cultures and angles especially on what ā€œthe darkā€ even is wonderful! Going on from that, I feel like the book is trying to hint at me that the relationship between the Dragon and the Dark is not so clear cut

    Interesting. I like that line of thought. Obviously, read and find out.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, as always, for the awesome replies!!


      I think from this and previous posts of yours, part of your issue is not jiving well with Jordanā€™s writing style. That you consider Egweneā€™s experiences an ā€œinfo dumpā€ might be suggestive.

      Iā€™ve certainly come to wonder how much of a writing style problem there is. Iā€™m curious to see how that tracks however. Book 3, for instance, is so far much more enjoyable for me than books 1&2. So far, itā€™s a bit heavy on the Tar Valon court intrigue, which might bore some people, but it is working for me much more, largely because, I think, the stakes and the problems are just more clearly outlined and felt, even if there are serious mysteries afoot (like what the hell Selene and the black ajar are up to and how far the girlsā€™ hunt is going to take them).

      In that vein, I think the Egwene in Falme sequence is interesting. My original comments were from someone whoā€™d seen the TV version first, and I was almost certainly crude in saying ā€œinfo dumpā€. Off the top of my head, however, I think do stand by my critique. The key difference was not just Jordanā€™s style but the staging of events and revelations. Jordan gives us many of the key revelations as the Seanchan company are going from the way gate back to Falme. Itā€™s almost a walk-and-talk. For me, it distracted from what Egwene was going through, especially the relative focus on how other Suldam thought of Egweneā€™s suldam. The show, on the other hand, immediately and almost entirely situates Egwene in a kennel/prison cell. That sets the feel and tone of the situation in a completely different, and IMO, better and more focused way. The show, intelligently, depicts what Egwene wants to do, through her imagination, and what she canā€™t do, through her punishment, very well. The visuals also made it clear just how much she was going through. All of that is what I meant by ā€œinfo dumpā€. However much the events hit hard in the book, comparatively, it felt like they were being portrayed in a somewhat more matter of fact fashion. It would be interesting, even for me, to revisit the sequence in the book and think about it from a stylistic stand point ā€¦ thereā€™s a chance Iā€™m way off here.

      Beyond that, one of my main problems with the first two books are the endings. Iā€™m not sure the ending of book 2 is easily differentiated from that of book 1, and criticising book 1ā€™s ending seems somewhat normal amongst the fandom. Iā€™m guessing Book 2 links with the rest of the series more, and thatā€™s part of the relative love. But apart from that, I see no reason to have enjoyed the big magical fight in the sky any more than book 1. At least with book 1 it was clear that they had ventured to a very special and old and mysterious space and so it made sense that a lot of new and intense stuff would happen there. Baā€™alzamon appearing, out of nowhere, to fight in the sky with Rand doing ā€œsomethingā€ to win, compared to connecting to the eye of the world in some way ā€¦ Iā€™m not sure I can enjoy that.

      As for general stylistic thoughts, I would say my vague feeling is Jordan wants the characters to be moving and talking more than I like, and I think Iā€™d prefer more emphasis on moments and situations and feelings and thoughts. When there are feelings and thoughts, so far, they seem to come out of the rush of events. Obviously, the girls in Tar Valon in book 3, and even Matā€™s night of gambling in Tar Valon before leaving (where Iā€™m up to), are much more enjoyable for me. Maybe Iā€™ll be a ā€œslogā€ fan!

      Yeah. Baā€™alzamon is also the guy youā€™ve been seeing in the show ;). Itā€™s not REALLY a huge reveal, since Jordan intended most readers to have guessed it by the time it happens. It also happens fairly soon in your reading. Not a huge spoiler, since itā€™s so obvious as a watcher. Thatā€™s actually what I was dodging around in earlier discussions with you because I didnā€™t know if you realized they were one and the same.

      Yea interesting. It seemed the sort of thing that the show could have been adapting it the way they did by joining together a few things in a few different ways. When you asked me about this you mentioned something about the ā€œdark oneā€™s fateā€ which is still the confusing part ā€¦ itā€™s not clear if the dark one and ishamael are different and weā€™ve not seen the dark one and their direct actions at all, or, has some sort of merging occurred. So far, Iā€™d guess the book wants us to think thereā€™s some close alignment as Ishamael/Baā€™alzamon has mentioned the countless repetitions of the wheel of time and his battles with the dragon (even in the prologue of EotW I think), despite it seeming like Ishamael the person was born in the previous age. Iā€™ll have to read and find out I guess! Though it seems the S2 finale might get there before my books do.

      Jordan often wrote what happened, and then filled in all the blanks through dialog that happens books later.

      Yea, stylistically, I think this is problematic for me. I donā€™t mind mysteries at all, but this tendency irks me I think.

      But I agree that I was surprised it didnā€™t happen in S2. It was an interesting choice to make Ishy take Fainā€™s role in S2. It works, though.

      Definitely the one thing that Iā€™ve missed about the show so far. Though itā€™s been hinted at. Fain got the dagger at the end of season 1, and is currently in Falme, and presumably is the one that ā€œcrucifiedā€ the fade, and the preview of the S2 finale has shown the dagger making an appearance. So itā€™ll be interesting. For me, there wasnā€™t even enough Fain/Shadar in book 2 ā€¦ I was rather bothered that the characterā€™s role ended with an info dump from Moraine ā€¦ though we did get to see clearly from Matā€™s fighting what the dagger actually is capable of.

      the book is trying to hint at me that the relationship between the Dragon and the Dark is not so clear cut

      Interesting. I like that line of thought. Obviously, read and find out.

      One of the biggest examples I can think of from memory, though perhaps very minor, is a dream in book 1 where I think thereā€™s a line where Rand sees his reflection and thinks he sees Baā€™alzamonā€™s face. I could have that wrong, but Iā€™m pretty sure thereā€™s a mirror-reflection scene in there.

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Some interesting points here! Sorry on the delayed reply.

        The ā€œwalk and talkā€ā€¦yeah, happens a lot in the beginning. Most of my fond memories are about stories told by charactersā€¦ kinda a ā€œplay within a playā€ mechanism. For a show-first person, I can see how your headcanon on that could be as more exposition. ā€œWeep for Manetheranā€ has a special place in a lot of hearts.

        As for ā€œwhat people think of Egweneā€™s Suldamā€ā€¦ Rennaā€™s a bit of a recurring character, not a throwaway. And the way Suldam think is actually a little bit important as you get to know the Seanchan (who are themselves not throwaways, as Iā€™m sure you figured out). Hereā€™s the stylistic point: Jordan paints us several cultures, many extremely unpleasant, that are not aligned with the Dark. One of my critiques of the show is how they changed Shadar Logoth because the story of Aridhol is pretty important - ā€œThe victory of the light is allā€, a culture that lost all semblance of honor in their fight against evil and ultimately succumbed to something just as dark, but just as ā€œnot of the Shadowā€.

        Obviously, the girls in Tar Valon in book 3, and even Matā€™s night of gambling in Tar Valon before leaving (where Iā€™m up to), are much more enjoyable for me. Maybe Iā€™ll be a ā€œslogā€ fan!

        Could be! Stick around and youā€™ll hear me rant about the Slog like that old guy who ā€œwalked barefoot to school in the winterā€. The slog isnā€™t a set of books; itā€™s a period of 10 years where very little happened and all these WoT superfans had to wait patiently. Nothing is wrong with a politicking book with no big moves, unless youā€™d waited 5+ years for big moves and you immediately know you have to wait 2 more when you finish that book (which, if youā€™re like me, you finished around 4am on the day following release day).

        itā€™s not clear if the dark one and ishamael are different and weā€™ve not seen the dark one and their direct actions at all

        I never thought how being show-first would influence this take. Remember how the book doesnā€™t feed you ā€œRand is the Dragonā€ until you should have already figured it out yourself? Ditto with the Ishy thing. You get a straight answer in book 3, but thereā€™s enough cards on the table for you to know already. I think the show is making it a bit hard for you to put 2 and 2 together because they do things differently.

        Thatā€™s actually why I stepped around it oddly. The way I saw the show, S1 basically spoiled the whole Ishy/DarkOne thing entirely. But it seems it instead muddies the water up for some show-first folks. When youā€™re done with book 3, if you still donā€™t get things I said (maybe Iā€™m just confusing :) ), hit me up and we can chat about it and youā€™ll see.

        Though itā€™s been hinted at. Fain got the dagger at the end of season 1, and is currently in Falme, and presumably is the one that ā€œcrucifiedā€ the fade, and the preview of the S2 finale has shown the dagger making an appearance.

        No future spoilers here. Yes, Fain absolutely crucified the Fade. It wonā€™t get mentioned again the books, and was implicit when he started being in control of the Trollocs and Darkfriends. How that plays out in the show, I have absolutely no idea. As you know, Fain wasnā€™t close under the eyes of Darkfriends by the end of book 2. He and Ishy being in the same room is problematic to him, which means either theyā€™re cutting parts of his story arc (I have mixed feelings about that, considering how awesome Johann Myers is doing) or theyā€™re going to have to redirect later like they did for Mat. Honestly, as you know, he might just be behind because Mat is behind.

        Youā€™ll see more Fain and Shadar Logoth in the books. Both are fairly important to the plot in ways you couldnā€™t possibly guess.

        One of the biggest examples I can think of from memory, though perhaps very minor, is a dream in book 1 where I think thereā€™s a line where Rand sees his reflection and thinks he sees Baā€™alzamonā€™s face. I could have that wrong, but Iā€™m pretty sure thereā€™s a mirror-reflection scene in there

        No, youā€™re right, the whole ā€œHIS FACEā€ things happened how you remember. I donā€™t want to say anything about some of those things because your theories obviously touch through every book into the finale, but I love hearing your theories. Obviously youā€™re not 100% hitting every point (if you were, it would be a boring series), but youā€™re also coming really close to some I wouldnā€™t have expected, or didnā€™t even really formulate until a reread.