We, the admin team, decry all forms of settler-colonialism, and we recognize that Zionism is a pro-settler-colonialist position.
Therefore we propose that should no longer be accepting of any Zionist accounts on our instances.
Please upvote for agree, downvote for disagree.
Note: we only count votes by instance members of dbzer0 and anarchist.nexus, plus a few vouched-for external users.
Hi mateys, I’ve kept things simple in the above text, for brevity, but in fact it took the admin team quite a while to get to this stage. We have discussed the policy change extensively, and a variety of different perspectives emerged. I will attempt to sum them up below as best I can:
-
The “this isn’t that complicated” school of thought goes something like this: If someone is consistently posting comments that mirror Hasbara talking points (e.g. justifying the genocide in Gaza, consistently painting Palestinians as terrorists and Israel as the victim), then they should be instance banned. It’s just not acceptable for Zionists to be allowed on our instances.
-
The “slippery slope” / “purity test” school of thought is that banning people for having an “unpopular” political opinion would potentially mean banning half the fediverse, if more and more of these policies were enacted over time. To attempt to mitigate this we are keeping the scope of this rule as narrow as possible, and I also don’t think many of our users will be affected. Also, we typically don’t have frequent policy changes, and I have no reason to expect that to change moving forward.
-
Another important discussion point was “how do we decide whether someone is pro-Zionist or not?” We can’t always be 100% sure of someone’s true intentions, we can only go on what they have posted and that is subject to interpretation. I don’t feel there is an easy answer to this one, except to say that we would have to be pretty certain before issuing a perma-ban.
-
The “geopolitics don’t matter” school of thought is that trying to be on the “correct” side of every issue is kind of pointless because nothing that happens in lemmy chat forums will ever make an ounce of difference in the real world. Don’t bother moderating users over political/ideological differences, just let people argue if they want. While I can totally empathize with this sentiment, I can also see the case for taking a clear stance on this topic in accordance with our values and the overwhelming support for the Palestinian cause among our users. Personally, I am advocating in favor of the resolution.
Please add your comments below if you want to provide your own thoughts on the topic, or have any questions.
expiry: 7


So basically, you don’t even bother to do basic web searches, seem to consider that as some sort of exhausting activity to shame people for doing, and you treat everything as a joke. Makes sense, your argument came off as some sort of uninformed joke, I shouldn’t have assumed it was anything more. Thanks for clearing that up!
If any German, at any point once the details of their genocide became plain to see, said:
“I’m not in favor of nazism, or neonazism, I am in favor of postnazism, and YOU must recognize the distinction or YOU’RE the intolerant dangerous one!”
Any human being with a brain would see how absurd and disengenuous that is to say.
Trying to give any cover whatsoever to the genocide happening is fucking nasty.
Edit to add: really, fuck you.
Not assuming anything this time around, thanks for your previous heads up! Haha, nice one!
edit reply: Yep, sabotaging a conversation to try to have the last word by drowning out criticism instead of having a conversation based on reality does that.
Yep, once I finally make the similarity unavoidable, it’s “you ackshually already told me you weren’t serious cuz you said LOL at my argument”.