So I saw this post when browsing: https://anarchist.nexus/c/slop/p/326064/cw-fascist-symbols-the-absolute-state-of-the-german-left. After sitting in the back of my mind for quite a while it sparked an idle interest in the rules of this instance where I saw the No Zionism rule. I then checked the rules of dbzer0 but couldn’t find the same rule. The flotilla post says that both instances should have the same rules so I’m just wondering if this has changed?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s vague and up for interpretation. I could definitely see some idiot arguing that it isn’t right wing because they’re a leftist. By explicitly stating it you make the intent a lot clearer.
And it is an extra rule, rule 11, not just a clarification or extension of rule 5. I think that does count as having differing rules.
deleted by creator
OK, so the profile the c/slop post is referring to should definitely be banned, right?
deleted by creator
Unsurprisingly when browsing that accounts comment history they appeared to make the exact argument I was talking about:
[…] I just wanted to point out that there are different types of Zionism as there are different types of Islamism. Some are oppressive and/or used to oppress while some are not. But generalizing is simply false.
For one there are multiple types of Zionism and historically Socialist Zionism was long the popular type. But recently unfortunately Religious and Revisionist Zionism gained popularity under Netanjahu. And Israel’s government want people to think that they are the “true” Zionists, but that is not true. Opposing Netanjahu and supporting Zionism is not contradictory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_Zionism
deleted by creator
It definitely does, but I doubt anyone not active on nexus frequents this comm.




