We’re moving closer to digital IDs.

  • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    You know, I’m still on the fence about a universal digital id. Yes, it can be a tool of mass surveillance, but in 2025 governments don’t need it to track everything you do online. And anonymity allows a lot of assholes to speak without fear of consequences. Politicians get a lot of death threats, women get a lot of abuse… It has to be controlled and used in a way that respects the right to privacy, but it could be a solution to many problems online.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This sounds like more of a “well I can’t control it anyway, and they already know everything, so fine” kind of cop-out as opposed to an actual argument in favor of digital ID.

      What benefit would it provide?