For decades AT&T has sought to shovel its broadband network upgrade costs on to the shoulders of other companies. It was the primary catalyst for the net neutrality wars, after AT&T made it clear it wanted to (ab)use its monopoly over broadband access to force companies like Google to pay an extra troll toll if they wanted their traffic to reach AT&T customers.

In recent years AT&T’s tactics have shifted.

The FCC’s Universal Service Fund (USF) program historically involves a small surcharge on voice and broadband lines that helps pay for broadband to rural schools and unserved regions. The program has been facing a shortfall thanks to the death of the landline, forcing many to suggest expanding the contribution base to include tech giants like Netflix, Google, and Facebook.

The FCC is having conversations about how to shore up the contribution base so funding for the program remains stable. AT&T, unsurprisingly, has been quick to enter those conversations with enthusiastic support for making tech giants pay for broadband upgrades.

…

All while getting untold billions of dollars in regulatory favors (like the death of net neutrality and broadband privacy protections), subsidies, and massive tax breaks — often in exchange for network upgrades that are somehow always half-completed.

The reason U.S. broadband remains spotty, sluggish, and expensive in 2023 is concentrated monopoly power and the corrupt politicians who protect it (see: the entirety of the GOP, and a sizeable chunk of the DNC). Yet somehow when it comes time for the FCC to shore up the USF and expand access to affordable broadband, cracking down on monopoly power never even enters the conversation.