• BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of those cases where “first you learn the rules. Then you can learn how to break them.”

    • soloner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fr I didn’t know what I was doing and tried it … broke both of my legs and gave me a concussion.

      Don’t mess around with -1/12!

    • Tavarin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t like the Ramanujan explanation at all because c - 4c doesn’t equal the divergent series, since 4c is only supposed to subtract from every other number, so it has more terms at every single limit of n, and thus more terms at infinity. So c - 4c is just -3c, not a divergent series.

        • Tavarin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except it is. Infinities can have different sizes, and the size of an infinity needs to be taken into account when working with them.

          Rama subtracted one infinity that is twice the size of another from it, so he subtracted twice as many numbers as his equation implies.

          • jana@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Infinities do have different sizes, yes. But not on that scale. Both of these are countably infinite sets.

            Think about this: there are infinitely many primes. Obviously, not every number is prime. But you can still map primes 1:1 with the natural numbers. They’re both the same size of infinity.

            • Tavarin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not when you’re adding them together.

              c - 4c = -3 - 6 - 9 - 12…

              In order to make c the same as the divergent series you have to subtract the series:

              f = 0 + 4 + 0 + 8 …

              Which is not the same series as 4c.

                • Tavarin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It makes the series equal length. You’ll notice this is discussed in the wikipedia article, and a bunch of bullshit handwaving has to be done to try and correct for it.

                  c - 4c = -3 - 6 - 9 - 12…

                  Simple as that, not some crap divergent series. Rama was a troll.

                  • jana@leminal.space
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re adding a bunch of zeroes. Zero is the additive identity. It doesn’t change the value.