Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to cats@lemmy.world · 2 years agoI think my human might be an idiotlemmy.mlimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageI think my human might be an idiotlemmy.mlFacelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to cats@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squareFacelikeapotato@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down2·2 years agoYeah, nonsense would’ve been a better word. Or word salad, it doesn’t get said enough.
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down3·2 years agoI think you were looking for “gibberish.”
minus-squareBebo@sffa.communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·2 years agoExactly what I was thinking. “jargon” to be replaced by gibberish.
minus-squareglibg10b@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoI had this exact same thought. I think “jargon” in the original post should be “gibberish”.
minus-squarejscummy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoNot sure if that’s right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say “gibberish” instead of “jargon”
minus-squareledtasso@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoI had precisely the same idea. I suppose “jargon” should have been “gibberish.”
minus-squareKaryoplasma@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoWernicke’s aphasia.
Yeah, nonsense would’ve been a better word. Or word salad, it doesn’t get said enough.
I think you were looking for “gibberish.”
Exactly what I was thinking. “jargon” to be replaced by gibberish.
I had this exact same thought. I think “jargon” in the original post should be “gibberish”.
Not sure if that’s right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say “gibberish” instead of “jargon”
I had precisely the same idea. I suppose “jargon” should have been “gibberish.”
Wernicke’s aphasia.