• Xusies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The difference is the $500m loss will continue to accrue and continue into 2024 so long as the strikes continue, while that $47m will stay relatively constant. And that $47m may be yearly, but that’s $47m out of their $500m+ earnings, per year.

    • rjthyen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they are estimating profit of 10-13 billion this year unless that figure was revenue. 500 and 47 million aren’t even that relevant

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s still like a 5% hit in just a few months. That’s going to increase the longer this goes on, and its going to accelerate as they start to run out of projects at the end of the pipelines.

      • Resonosity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        $500m out of a $10b profit is 5% loss. It it gets up to $1b out of $10b, then that’s a 10% loss. I’m not sure you can say that’s not irrelevant. These businesses are losing tons of money.

        • rjthyen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more of a comment on the production companies saying they came afford to meet strikers’ demands yet can report numbers like that to their shareholders.