• Grant_M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes indeed he was. He was found to be GUILTY of raping E Jean Carroll

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, he was not. You are spreading misinformation. He was found to liable for rape. A conviction is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, liable is more likely than not guilty. This is not pedantic, this is the difference between decades in jail and not.

        • Grant_M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          He raped E Jean Carroll – period. You can worship rapist trump all you like. Go ahead.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what you said. You said he was convicted of rape, that’s not true. If you take pointing out a factual inaccuracy as worshipping Trump you’re just as much a tribalist as those on Jan. 6

    • Ganbat@lemmy.fmhy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically right because it was a civil case rather than a criminal case. He was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll.