• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I genuinely think he’s just a pawn in a bigger game in which some powers wanted twitter gone.

    • tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why gone? I understood that the Saudi government just wanted to de-anonymize it (i.e be informed about the authors of any critical tweets).

      Like that guy who has been condemned to death for a critical tweet to his… 8 followers.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        He hasn’t stopped a lot of folks, including all the shitty ones that would normally be banned. Hell, he unbanned them in many cases (i.e. Trump.) With Blue he gave them a way to be all the top responses in comments no matter how shitty their take is. Making the feed useless can be just as bad (if not worse) then censoring it.

    • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. He may be influenced by others, but it’s clear his ego is just that enormous and that his emotional immaturity makes him do stupid shit impulsively.

        • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if he was ‘manipulated’ he would be the same person regardless if he wasn’t. He is clearly a self-serving person with ego problems. There are no billionaires that aren’t fucked up people.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh for sure! But a stupid person may do stupid things on their own, and more stupid things when manipulated.