There was a time where this debate was bigger. It seems the world has shifted towards architectures and tooling that does not allow dynamic linking or makes it harder. This compromise makes it easier for the maintainers of the tools / languages, but does take away choice from the user / developer. But maybe that’s not important? What are your thoughts?

  • ck_@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    a year ago

    In Linux, dynamic links have always been a steady thing.

    Hot take: This is only still the case because the GNU libc cannot be statically linked easily