“A cycle path built through part of Sydney’s inner west will be ripped up on Tuesday, five months after it was completed, due to a council decision described by riders as a knee-jerk reaction to complaints from residents.”
“A cycle path built through part of Sydney’s inner west will be ripped up on Tuesday, five months after it was completed, due to a council decision described by riders as a knee-jerk reaction to complaints from residents.”
@[email protected] @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @jakecoppinger @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews I just got this too! Ridiculous!!
@SydneyCyclewaysFan @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @jakecoppinger @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews The exact same letter with the same wording?
And to any other people who commented: Did you get the same pro-forma response from the council as well?
@[email protected] @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @jakecoppinger @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews Yep
@SydneyCyclewaysFan @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @jakecoppinger @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews Apparently “effectively engaging with the community” at Canada Bay council means sending people a pro-forma letter.
I decided to write them back…
"Dear Shankar, Andrew, Brendan, and all whom this may concern,
"One more thing.
"Just a little heads up about something.
"Next time, before you send everyone who responded to an inquiry with the same pro-forma letter, you might want to check that it hasn’t gone viral on social media.
"Because, when there’s several Mastodon threads full of people who received the same pro forma letter, it comes across as a little insincere to say you are ‘effectively engaging with the community as part of this process’.
https://aus.social/@jakecoppinger/110097973671882457
https://urbanists.social/@SydneyCyclewaysFan/110468342468417639
"Just a thought.
Kindest regards,
AJ"
#NSWpol #AusPol #Politics #CanadaBay #cycling #bike #bicycles #bicycle #cycle #Urbanism #UrbanPlanning #politics
@[email protected] @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @jakecoppinger @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews Love it!
@ajsadauskas @SydneyCyclewaysFan @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews This was my reply I received 19th of April. I sent an email Apr 13th seeking clarification on the CityHub article and if the position on removal had changed (the article was incorrect - the author must have been confused by the council wording): https://cityhubsydney.com.au/2023/04/inner-west-cycleway-to-stay-after-council-flips-on-decision-to-demolish/
The Deaign Modification Proposal has this photo which sets things out clearly, which I included in my analysis at https://jakecoppinger.com/2023/03/canada-bay-council-plans-to-remove-heath-st-cycleway-due-to-a-misleading-traffic-report/
Dear Jake,
Thank you for your email.
I can confirm that council is not removing the cycleway route but only modifying the design.
If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
…
@jakecoppinger @[email protected] @SydneyCyclewaysFan @jedsetter @ukuku @[email protected] @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews “modifying the design” is an extraordinarily dishonest way to describe removing the entire thing but painting a couple extra bike logos on the road.