alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1308arrow-down1external-linkIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·1 year agoThis stuff should fall under the same laws as Arms.
minus-squareNounsAndWords@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoSo protected broadly under the second amendment instead of protected broadly under the first amendment?
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, exporting military weapons is illigal unless the government agrees
minus-squareNounsAndWords@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYes, yes, but this isn’t harmful speech military AI, this is simply commercial AI sold at scale. Clearly different, and if not, our lawyers will argue that it is until after we’ve made all our money.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else? Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNo its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most. And i care very much about privacy.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago And i care very much about privacy. Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t. Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago No its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most Do you have evidence of this happening in China?
This stuff should fall under the same laws as Arms.
So protected broadly under the second amendment instead of protected broadly under the first amendment?
No, exporting military weapons is illigal unless the government agrees
Yes, yes, but this isn’t
harmful speechmilitary AI, this is simply commercial AI sold at scale. Clearly different, and if not, our lawyers will argue that it is until after we’ve made all our money.Hm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else?
Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
No its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most.
And i care very much about privacy.
Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t.
Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.
Do you have evidence of this happening in China?