• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’d have bought a Deck even if it only lasted a few months, because I got one two months after launch on pre-reservation.

    Well, that might just be where we differ. I don’t find it fiscally responsible to drop 400+ on a piece of hardware I’d only use for 2 months.

    I’m not telling you how to live your life, just saying that ain’t for me, chief 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Are you being deliberately obtuse?

      The device isn’t going to cease to exist, just because it was only for sale for two months.

      Even if it had only been for sale for two months, I’d have gotten to enjoy using it for at least three years by now.

    • GreyEyedGhost
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Your thought process makes sense where the value of the product is dependent on market acceptance, such as a console. This is a small portable computer with an integrated controller that plays PC games. The value of this product isn’t dependent on market acceptance, but on ability to perform the task and durability. Its capabilities were known before general release, as was the quality of Valve’s hardware. I can certainly see the stance that many games weren’t well supported when it was first released, and that the hardware isn’t able to run some of the more demanding games produced, at least until custom support was added. But anything you got except the hardware would be usable elsewhere if you upgraded to another computer, whether it be handheld or more traditional.